RL Benchmark: SQLite

Doesn't run, so can't rate it.... Belay that one! Installed, youngest OS in the table, but 31.877 seconds total is definitely not shabby! What's odd is not getting that table of comparisons. Any clues?

10.231 seconds stock rom , what a beast this note 3 :p

Lame ui, so custom and awful. Comparison to devices from eons ago

Running 30 seconds on my Hyperdrive RlS 7 ROM. Set at 1023 MHz -lulzactive and Row. 20 seconds easy with 1900mhz over clock

27sec not bad for a budget phone. (LG Tribute was 40$ at best buy)

Doesn't run, so can't rate it.

41.6 Seconds In Running Android 4.4 KK.☺

Running 30 seconds on my Hyperdrive RlS 7 ROM. Set at 1023 MHz -lulzactive and Row. 20 seconds easy with 1900mhz over clock

41.6 Seconds In Running Android 4.4 KK.☺

We need new devices in charts end of this year 2014... Please add update every month of 2015.

67 .029 sec mmhmp rom 2.3.5 @710mhz ok suppose.

36.5 overall on my nexus 4 rooted with the stock rom and stock kernel

18.something seconds T989 juggernaut 5.0

10.231 seconds stock rom , what a beast this note 3 :p

Samsung Galaxy SII Epic 4g Touch Calks 2.8.1 rom Desperado kernel 1.7 oc

Cool app. 52 on huawei x5 o/c

Good results for htc sensation xe - 38 sec.

Stock s3. Not bad i guess.

12.93 sec.s Note 3

16.008 galaxy s4 active

Great nice tests i would like have it more.

T989 gs2 scored 16.274

29.9 galaxy nexus

as title.

Yet another small but awesome benchmark tester like quadrant

Note 2 @ 15.067 secs in 4.4.2

18 sec

Download this and ran the test and got an overall score of 13.311 on my Samsung Galaxy Note 2(T889) running jediX JB 4.1.2 @1920Mhz.

28.4 seconds

Jedimaster 9 KONE kernal 2000mzh OC : sec 14.031

29 seconds on my nexus s 4.0.4

How can this be reliable when people are posting under 20 seconds with single core processors no matter what over clocking u do it is impossible for a Samsung galaxy s to give under 20 secs especially if clocked at 1.2 ghz as I read in one of the comments either people are down right lying or this app just likes certain phones because my HTC amaze is giving 22 secs at best with both cores overclocked at 1.72ghz per core on gingerbread rooted and let me tell u this is blazing fast phone even with 1 core

16.9 - Galaxy S2. Dormanix Kernel and AOKP M6+ rom. Some other tweaks such as overclocking and read-ahead used.

Jedimaster 9 KONE kernal 2000mzh OC : sec 14.031

Running 30 seconds on my Hyperdrive RlS 7 ROM. Set at 1023 MHz -lulzactive and Row. 20 seconds easy with 1900mhz over clock

Recently updated, gonna let it sit a night and see if trim make a difference. BTW to everyone who is crying over single cores beating their phones, when I had the Galaxy S with ext4 voodoo lagfix that destroyed every single phone out there when it came to IO performance, also over time nand gets crappy without trim

15.463 second on first try.. standard, no root and no overclocked... can get 14s..

My icemobile apollo touch made 39 seconds 1ghz no overclock or root

20.76 sec. Overall on STOCK HTC One, quad core at 1.7GHz with 2GB of RAM and 32GB Internal storage.......AWESOME PHONE BTW

CPU clock speed has nothing to do with SQL. It is measuring the efficiency of your SQL software and to a lesser extent, the performance of your eMMC or sdcard storage device. CPU clocks won't make your Hard Drive faster.