ND filter

Sucked

Good

Should have dials to access all available ND filters. Jumping from 8 to 16 when there are a lot if us using ND 10 or 12 on variables. Also, timers should be on dials as well. No full range of shutter speeds. Heck, my 30 year old Pentax ME film camera had more shutter speeds than available in this waste of an app

Sorry your system needs to be updated to current camera terminology and ND filter calibrated info.....

ND32 is the max for calculation. I often use use ND400 (9 stops) and ND1000 (10 stops)

With the current influx of long exposure shooting and the corresponding extreme ND filters, limiting the ND value to 32 is not enough. Was hoping to be able to fill in a ND value myself... Also, diaphragm is typically not a variable and is therefore not needed.

Why not covering all the speed?

Drop down menu width needs reduce. Color selected are not appealing. Functionality needs to extend on number of stops. Let me know if you need help regarding gui.

Good app

As mentioned not very useful if higher stops are missing I wouldn't use ND value but value in f-stops reductions The most important f-stops are 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 13, 20 But we usually stack two filters so additional at least 9 (3+6) ; 16 (10+6) But all other combo would be nice Actually you should make it that one can pick any number from 1 to 20 in f-stops reductions If you finish it it would be definitely 5 star app I will wait for the update and then change my rating Good luck

Not enough filters,need 10 stop big stopper,soft 0.3 ,0.6 ,0.9

Why no.....ND10 ......seems a big miss

No 10 stop option

100 iso is the only correct setting. Can't understand iso1600 at say 1/125 when calculated is faster, I couldn't figure that out. So I am going to try iso100 ONLY, and use that to calculate SLOWER speeds- please update this app asap .

As mentioned in a number of comments already, the basis is there but it's not very useful for long exposures. Having a minimum 'proper' exposure time of 2 seconds is debatable but then now having options for a 10-stop filter is just bad. Not working on the suggestions is even worse. Instead of going for specific types of filters, allow for the selection 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.... 20 stops of ND and you'd be golden!

Very poor options

As mentioned not very useful if higher stops are missing I wouldn't use ND value but value in f-stops reductions The most important f-stops are 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 13, 20 But we usually stack two filters so additional at least 9 (3+6) ; 16 (10+6) But all other combo would be nice Actually you should make it that one can pick any number from 1 to 20 in f-stops reductions If you finish it it would be definitely 5 star app I will wait for the update and then change my rating Good luck

Not enough filters,need 10 stop big stopper,soft 0.3 ,0.6 ,0.9

Why no.....ND10 ......seems a big miss

100 iso is the only correct setting. Can't understand iso1600 at say 1/125 when calculated is faster, I couldn't figure that out. So I am going to try iso100 ONLY, and use that to calculate SLOWER speeds- please update this app asap .

As mentioned in a number of comments already, the basis is there but it's not very useful for long exposures. Having a minimum 'proper' exposure time of 2 seconds is debatable but then now having options for a 10-stop filter is just bad. Not working on the suggestions is even worse. Instead of going for specific types of filters, allow for the selection 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.... 20 stops of ND and you'd be golden!

Very poor options

Has potential Not enough filters,need 10 stop big stopper,soft 0.3 ,0.6 ,0.9